March 22, 2014

The Start of Cameras

Photography can be considered as technology’s most creative way of sharing and documenting knowledge. This infographic shows the evolution of cameras from pure scratch to the advanced innovations we now have. Starting with basic concepts of the eye’s perception of light, we now belong in a generation of selfies and a society of quality filming.

Monica P. Tiongco
2013 - 21566

March 20, 2014

Reaction Paper: Imelda (2003)

Imelda Marcos has always been viewed as the most extravagant political figure the Philippines had ever produced – warranting the word "imeldific", meaning extravagant, to her name.

As the First Lady of the former dictator, Ferdinand Marcos, she enjoyed a certain degree of power and authority. She organized a number of lavish public events that cost millions of dollars in public funds. She also had a hand in committees that promoted art, culture and literature, and had several structures built for these undertakings, which then was not the real priority of the state.

As history shows, Imelda was indeed overly and excessively indulgent in all her minute details life has to offer. She had a vast collection of shoes, clothes and jewelries. She also traveled a lot to other countries all at the expense of public funds, and ultimately, the Filipino people.

I couldn’t help but pity her and at the same time, feel outraged, as I watched her defend their family’s atrocities to the nation. She also showed some signs of mental instability with all the superstitious and somewhat senseless beliefs she discussed and adhered to in the interview.

Her answers lacked clarity and rationale, and was met by laughter of the audience. Perhaps it was her refusal to believe that she and her husband were indeed the villains in their regime, despite the glaring proofs still evident in our present society.


Maybe it was traumatic, even for her, to have experienced and taken part in extreme cases of human rights violations, and these atrocities still haunt her to this day.

The Rhetoric of Cancer: Live with it

              In the Documentary of the Rhetoric of Cancer with Andrew Graystone, He defines what his rhetoric on cancer is. It is in contrast with the usual way of cancer in which we define cancer as the “enemy”, a “monster”. With these set in mind, we would say that those who have cancer are “battling” it. Andrew Graystone’s rhetoric on cancer is to live with cancer and accept these cancer cells like your own body. It’s been a norm that people comforting cancer patients by encouraging them to be brave, to win the battle and to survive.

               I would see two sides of a coin. The first would be fighting against cancer. The second would be living alongside cancer. The former, as I interpreted Andrew’s words, was something similar to personal struggles. It is something that you do against yourself. You would fight yourself and living like that is something anyone would not enjoy and it would mean struggling though life. As others say “You are living the life if you are having fun”, Struggling through life’s the opposite.

               However, that is not the only way we can speak of cancer and how to deal with it. The latter as the main topic of the podcast was something optimistic. It is living with what cancer is defined as an “enemy”. With this in mind, people with cancer would just happily live their lives with cancer, not wasting any moment on struggling against one’s self. Normal people are fortunate that they have all the time in the world to enjoy life and to have fun. I cannot say that people with cancer have a time limit, however with their condition, it is hard to enjoy life and we cannot say when we are about to die. Personally, I have met people who have cancer and I see them still smiling and enjoy their lives to the fullest. I know all of us would want to live life without having regrets. The biggest regret I could think of is not enjoying life. As I speak for those people with cancer, I would impose a message to live life as yourself, and not against yourself.


               Just live life with it.

March 19, 2014

Autonomy

"Welcome to the world, my son.” Dr. Newman exclaims, as he screws the last bolt into his newly made robot atop his workbench.

Dr. Newman is a renowned scientist for the Robotic Engineering of Genetic Grafters – a euphemism for human-makers.

In the thriving and competitive community the world has become, humans had to find ways to make their offspring better and more adaptive in responding to demands for work efficiency amidst their actively growing economy.

One great president was not enough. One great thinker was not enough. One great innovator was not enough. Everyone had to be great. Everyone had to be the best thinkers. Everyone had to be innovators.

This necessity ushered in the first generation of robotically manufactured humans. They were superior in every humanly aspect and proved to be a successful project. They quickly rose to key government and corporate positions and brought radical change to their society. Soon after, many countries adopted this technology and worked to improve it for the use of every family. Crimes, poverty, discrimination, environmental issues and wars have just become century old stories. There was social equality and justice in the thriving utopia the world has become.

Dr. Newman just finished working on “Sapien”, his newest genetic grafting robot, whose processor has been modeled to his very own brain.

“Many have expressed their concerns against your newest project, Dr. Newman. Are you sure you have the necessary safeguards to prevent that model on not working in favor of us?” Mr. Dwight, CEO of the Dwight Robotic Manufacturing Company, asks with a hint of skepticism.

“Robotic takeovers, zombie apocalypses, and whatnots were the crude scientific assumptions of the future that our ancestors used to express with their old films and their little flip-page reading materials. It’s the age of dynamism, my friend. Aren’t we generation seventy-eight? Let’s show the world the greatest innovation they’ll ever see before we retire.” Dr. Newman then reaches out and pushes the button to start up the robot. “After all, in order to make the best possible human, the creator must be highly familiar and sympathetic to it.”

The robot begins drawing the human organs and restructuring them. Mr. Dwight walks out of the lab, leaving the doctor with his beloved creation.

The first sample human product of Dr. Newman’s machine instantly became a hit sensation for the people. He proved to be the best in every field – a standout in an already perfect bunch.

Everyone wanted to adopt a genetically grafted offspring from Sapien. Despite protocols restricting products from being released into the market without having been tested flaw-free until retirement, the company decides to lift those to give way for the uproar on the demand for the products of the latest genetic grafter.

Generation seventy-nine is seen to have a minor character flaw a couple of years before the last of work-active members of generation seventy-eight will soon enjoy retirement. They were unusually sympathetic to robots. Cases have emerged of Sapien’s humans harming others, even their family, if they treat robots and machinery badly or even just speak ill of them.

Conflict soon erupted between the old generation humans and generation seventy-nine humans at the prime of their maturity. Old generation humans quickly scrambled to manufacture weaponry and use their weapons to exterminate the new generation. They were met with greater and more advanced technologies, as the new generation repels them.

As the third generation of Sapien’s creations are in production, the old generation humans are left hiding and resorting to manual reproduction – usually failing due to their artificial nature and old age.

Meanwhile, in Dr. Newman’s old lab, a voice over his old workbench whispers, “Welcome to the world, my son.”

Which is preferable, to fight cancer or to live with it?: a reaction on The Rhetoric of Cancer

The ‘Rhetoric of Cancer’ shown how different cancer patients and experts define cancer. Some says it is a “battle” or a “struggle” to fight for, and an “enemy” to eradicate. Others, including the main character of the podcast Andrew Graystone, vision cancer as something that is part of life for those who experience it; that it is a part of the body, part of their human process. He further said that living with it and accepting it, cancer, is better than treating it as a battle.
These shows that language whether on what medium it may be it is always conventional, that different kinds of people interprets and see that thing in different ways depending on what and how they experienced such a thing, also depending on the level of awareness and knowledge they are taught.
Treating cancer as a part of some people’s body and to live with it is a positive attribute to oneself. This optimistically strengthens you and removes stress along your struggle because you being ignited with optimism, that this is part of the process of living, a normal struggle of life and there is nothing to fear with it. As what Graystone’s Christian theologian mentioned that being part of the process of life is to come and go, that we are meant to die at some time, and nobody is exempted to that, it’s just that there are who die earlier than the others, and so you don’t have to dread of experiencing it--the cancer. It might be the way nature or god or whoever it is wants you to end your journey in life, and end is inevitable, it is constant so there is nothing to be scared about having that disease. You have to live with it as what Graystone pointed out. Never stress out yourself by it because it,stress, might makes cancer severe. Go on with your normal way of living and when the time comes that your travel in this world is about to end then accept it. For me, why waste time on going too expensive treatments if at the end you will still die? Better live prosperously, and treasure the time left, make the best out of it so that when the time comes that you have to say goodbye you can say that you enjoyed your last moments in the world, that you never regret how you spend your last days, months, years, and moments in earth because you did things normally and never wasted it.
You might say it is so easy for me to say thereafter because I have not experienced myself having cancer, that I don’t know what it feels begging for more minutes, more days, months, years to live. My stand on that is that I am not stressing that those with cancers must not look at it as a fight, that I am for with Graystone that you have to live with it, I also acknowledge visioning cancer as a fight and struggle. In life we share moments with people, and when we leave in the world we leave grief to those loved ones we have. They are the one who will mourn and not you, they will be the one who will tear and not you. The point is that fighting to overcome or postpone cancer is more than fighting for yourself but it corresponds to fighting for your loved ones as well. To fight against it doesn’t mean literally to defeat it for the rest of time but it could also be to hinder and stretch the time left. Perhaps its more on fighting against emotional frustrations that the illness may bring more than fighting physically.
Living with doesn’t mean you need not to fight for it, you have indeed need to fight for it. Fighting isn’t not just barriered on treating the illness but also hindering it, limiting its effect on yourself maybe by eating healthy foods so that by the time when the illness is too acute, severe, and is already malignant you are already prepared and your loved ones as well. Living with it and fighting it, the cancer, must go in both ways, they must be considered in the journey of having cancer.

At the end it’s still the decision and interpretation of someone that will prevail. There are different ways as what I said earlier on defining things and so do language of cancer. You may treat it as a battle, as an enemy, or a part of normal process, it is up to you because you are the one who experiences it and not anybody else. The struggles, the pain and everything you feel are all felt by you and not by others. Deep inside there are things that only you could understand, and only you could feel that it becomes hard to explain. So whatever approach you have make it. But if you need advices and encouragements, better listen to the podcast ‘Rhetoric of Cancer’, it will help.

March 18, 2014

The Imeldific Figure


Maybe the history I’ve known was not precisely unbiased among the different faces of the Marcos regime, but I couldn’t still quite picture myself getting ever in their favor. We were made familiar of the human rights violations, mass slaughter and plundering cases during the Martial Law. Also, almost all, if not all, of the infrastructures established at the time were credited to the World Bank. The former dictator, his family, and his cronies even had a substantial amount from these projects. For getting hold of the legislature and judiciary businesses, the succeeding republics have wasted a big amount to pay for foreign debts. People not knowing about these could have been because Marcos also got hold of the media. This was the kind of politics the Philippines had experienced. 

Through all the phases of his presidency, beside Ferdinand Marcos was his wife, the First Lady, Imelda Romualdez Marcos. An intelligent, responsible man marrying a beautiful singing lady appeared to have gotten the sympathy of many Filipinos. They were a perfect couple, some might say. True enough, Imelda has been his key to winning the elections. They campaigned together and Imelda has done things even beyond her role as the wife of the president. 

Maybe it was her unfailing and almost unchanging readied answer to every Filipino’s doubt that made me hesitate to believe in her motives. Beauty was the absolute solution she would say for all of our national dilemmas. Just how does she expect beauty to solve problems when people are experiencing hunger, poverty? She would always say that beauty is the most important and should come first all the time. But has she thought of all those who can do nothing but to look up into her laced gown and feel the big difference between them? 

She has lived an Imeldific life—extravagant, changing shoes everyday when there are kids who don’t even have a pair of slippers. Her obsession to beauty has paved the way to uncertainties of whether she managed to have a cultural center, a hospital built for the people’s sake or for her personal gratification. It was funny how self-conceited she was, giving away pictures of her faces to people. She may have thought too high of herself that she confidently speaks of how beautiful she was to have hundreds of suitors lining up. 

Imelda has received diverse judgments from people, yet one thing I can conclude about her is her strength, her guts to withstand every turn they had to make as a family and she as a woman.



Monica P. Tiongco
2013 - 21566

March 17, 2014

Imelda Romualdez Marcos

Imelda Romualdez Marcos


               My first impression of Imelda Marcos was that she was wasteful in spending her money. In my view, there no sense in spending money through those clothes, jewelry, and shoes of hers. Also, I already knew that she holds her principle firm and steady through any path. Having no idea of her jump start in life, the documentary gave me a lot of information that made me think about the way I think about her.  She was raised along the shores of Tacloban. Before she became Mrs. Marcos, her name was Imelda Romualdez. After some time, many admire her beauty in which she came in her teens. I was astounded that her beauty took her far, which is comparable of what we have today. I was curious to what brought her in the arms of Marcos because of her place which is Tacloban that is far away from Ilocos (Marcos’s hometown). I was not surprised as to why Marcos can’t get his eyes away from her. Eventually, they married and after that, Marcos campaigned as president. This gave a huge impact on the society because of him having Imelda also as a wife, not only did it empower Marcos’s image but also his cast for votes. Imelda, as a woman in her time, persevered in many places just to speak to people and to get their votes on Marcos. This gave me an impression that she was selfless. With her image, she outdid what a first lady would do. The responsibility she burdens to herself was admirable to the Filipinos. It inspired me as well. While the documentary was on going, she shared thoughts on her beliefs and principles about peace, love and beauty. In my opinion, it is as if she made her own philosophy, however I am not the one to judge, but almost everything she said in those were interesting.

               My impression after the film changed my mind about her. She is such an influential person, a responsible wife and a person that holds to what she believes in. The only thing that bothered me is her philosophy in a book she wrote. The way she connected apple to the Computer age of today was somewhat far from her philosophies she spoke of before she said that last. 

March 16, 2014

UNFOLDING and LOOKING OVER THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY: an IMELDA ROMUALDEZ-MARCOS Documentary



    History, since the fall of the Marcos regime, had been telling us about the hasty and bad side of the former president’s administration. We are told and taught to hate the Marcos’ particularly the former and late president Ferdinand Marcos Sr.. All throughout for more than two decades, Philippine History had been biased on the Marcos’s regime story. I testify this bias happening in our history because I have seen this phenomenon wayback grade school and high school whereby in all books related to Philippine History everything told about the Marcos’ administration was a mess, a rotten, and a worse government. Not until college when I know about the good side of Marcos. And now I am neither of the two side.
    “Imelda Documentary” is a way of showing the other side of the great story of the Philippines, giving the chance for the Marcos’ side to clear out the allegations against them. The film featured the former first lady of the Philippines and now representative of one of the districts of Ilocos Norte, with participations of her friends, family members, journalists, oppositions, and many others, portraying their concerns and commentaries regarding issues that are related and linked to Imelda and Ferdinand and their dictatorship.
    In the film Imelda tried to defend herself from the accusation of being luxurious, and extravagant which accordingly as what others believe led to country’s debt. I, after had pondered on the issue of the jewelry collections of Imelda which others believed acquired through corruptions and that came from the country’s money, think that it is so insensitive to think that indeed those were from the government’s money. Come to think of it, even simple or common person can afford to make collections of things how much more Imelda which was the wife of the late Ferdinand Marcos Sr. who was one of the richest person in the Philippines during that time. The film as well shown failures that are clearly can be attributed as mistakes of the administration such as the construction of the Manila Film Center that buried number of laborers. In which I believe to be true. And there many issues regarding the Marcos’ administration that are worth thinking for, provided that both sides gave their stands on the issue in the film.
    I admired the film’s unbiased documentation, though there a lot more on side of Imelda, still it showed the both sides’ stands on those issues. It is a great first step on taking ourselves out from the isolation of the beliefs about Marcos and his administration which is what our history had been teaching us for almost three decades.
    The film showed different issues during the administration of F.M., issues concerning her wife and him as well. By letting the Marcos’ side to defend and the opposition to express their views and opinions on the matters concerned, the film indeed can be considered great, a great film to watch which will make you ponder which side to believe and which side to reject, without bias and one-sidedness on the issues being linked. It makes us open-minded because we are now not just dealing with one perspective in making our decision but two sides, giving us the power to choose and decide. With the film we are given the opportunity to think out of the pedestal on the issues concerning Imelda, F.M., and the Marcos administration.
The film would be a great help to make people realize that we are fooled, that we are being taught one-sidedly, and that we are deprived of knowing the good side because we are detained in the belief that Marcos’ administration was a catastrophe to the country.
Other than giving informations on the Marcos’ administration, the film also tries to convey to its viewers that we should be moving out of our traditional belief and try to figure out the both sides of the story so that your decision on that issue will be not bias and is much reliable.

Jonelle J. Retorca
201337752

March 15, 2014

Running With Robots

I never really liked Blade Runner, but I've been mulling it over and it's given me a newfound appreciation for it. At first I only found the movie pretty, but I think, now, I get the substance behind it.

The movie's is set in a bleak future: polluted, dingy, and overcrowded. Those who can afford it leave Earth for off-world colonies. There have been advances in technology, but it's only accessible to those who can afford it. Everyone else makes do, much like life now. Androids, known as replicants, do the work deemed unfit for humans. Replicants gone rogue were taken care of by blade runners, special forces dispatched to kill them.

When I watch this movie, I’m reminded how creation breeds responsibility. Like different technologies, we’re not necessarily responsible for what people do with them, but we’re responsible for what they do. For example, we are responsible for the pollution caused by cars but we’re not responsible for people crashing them. The replicants created by the Tyrell Corporation are the same. I think the most responsible thing he did was give his replicants a failsafe—their four year lifespan. Otherwise he just let them run amok and let other people take care of it. That said, I think the replicants are more than just a representation of technology in this rapidly evolving age of zeroes and ones.


I thought it was really important how retiring replicants was very violent. Retirement sounds so innocuous, like one is merely deprogramming a replicant by flipping an off switch. Instead, the way they shot it makes looks like you're murdering someone. I thought that was really smart. In the movie, humanity can be measured through emotional response. Replicants are said to have emotions, though underdeveloped ones—but the ones we see are so human. They want to extend their lifespan and live beyond the duties they were assigned upon creation. It's like looking into a mirror.

Cadiz, MTM.

"Tears in Rain"

“I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the TannhƤuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time… to die…” 

Blade Runner, being a well-known sci-fi thriller movie, has shown different phases of science and technology and how each has shaped the society we live in. The 1982 film directed by Ridley Scott depicted what the ‘future’ would be like: mega-corporations around the world manufacturing genetically engineered organic robots, much like humans, but are distinguishably different in many ways. 

The film has successfully drowned me into the likes of becoming one of the people at that time or maybe even one of the ‘replicants.’ Sure enough, it would seem unfair for the part of the replicants to be created, but not to be destined to live for long the way they may wish to. Roy together with the otherNexus-6 models is a pitiful creature whose fate was pre-decided. But of course, he had the tendency to desire for more. And I liked how his desperation has been showed in the film through his actions which gave me goose bumps all the time.

I find the scene where Roy, literally removing Dr. Eldon Tyrell’s eye balls out, killed their creator, the genius behind the Tyrell Corporation, very thrilling that it was enough to deliver the message of how scary and dangerous the replicant really was. Blade Runner has just the right amount of suspense, drama, and science. 

Also, the soliloquy I quoted in the beginning had the last lines of Rutger Hauer as Roy Batty. It was a very powerful end which justifies his role in the movie. What made it more amazing was the fact that it was an impromptu monologue improvised by the actor. Though I also find Harrison Ford’s acting exemplary as the main protagonist of the story, I found his role as Rick Deckard rather ordinary, with all those skills always expected from the lead character. With that, Roy’s character was the most remarkable for me because it was an extraordinary side of what comes with improvements in science and technological innovations. 

Though these replicants may be products of science merely for corporate purposes and made to be terminated as well, they had the chance to be created to what they have become. Still, they had the opportunity to see what the world has to offer to them, even for a short while, and to go beyond worlds. That’s science.

March 11, 2014

The Imeldifica: A reaction to the documentary “Imelda”

Malcolm Aniag
2012-10792

History has judged unfavorably against the Marcos clan. Supposedly, they are known by the world as the dictatorial family who plundered the nation’s riches and have been, in punishment, sent in exile.

Except that they aren’t. They aren’t in exile.

Some Filipinos, particularly those who came from the same province of Ilocos in the North, or those who were down South, and some individuals who reside in the capital Manila still support Ferdinand Marcos. They believe that there was nothing wrong in what Marcos had wanted to do. They believe that there was only an inherent flaw in the Filipino culture. One that refused to be lorded over so explicitly. They believe also that the fault is not in Ferdinand Marcos, but in the people he surrounded himself with, his cronies.

This documentary makes that a plausible point.

The term “cronies” here is applied generally. There are the cronies such as Gilberto Duavit, who owned and controlled the mass media networks of the time. Fabian Ver who wielded the military police according to Marcos’ bidding.

Beyond the names of his friends and his political allies however, friends and allies could only go so far in arguing and being intimate with a man. Surely, there must have been someone with the leverage to convince Macoy to stop the atrocities and clear violations of human rights. Surely, someone with a connection stronger than friends. As such, there may no greater accessory to the crimes of martial law than his wife, Imelda Marcos.

This documentary bears the self-absorbed nature of Imelda Marcos. This is exhibited with her giving away her photos of her face. Her inability to go beyond the comforts of her status and know exactly the grievances of her people – supposedly giving them places of culture instead of a proper live to live. Her self-made philosophies of the true, the good and the beautiful, as opposed to reading and recognizing the existing and well-established philosophies of today. And most glaring of all – her apparent disgust with intelligence, succinctly pointed out with her nice quote, “There is a line fine between craziness, and intelligence.”

Yes, there may be. But perhaps Imelda Marcos is in the extreme side of only one spectrum.

I wouldn't fault a supposedly smart man Ferdie to go crazy and do the things he did if he had such a wife.

March 9, 2014

Juan Flavier: Science, Medicine and Society

ANIAG, John Malcolm S.
2012-10792

A Doctor of the Barrio: a concise biography of Dr. Juan Flavier

Even the Deparment of Health in its website acknowledges that former senator and former health secretary, Dr. Juan Flavier, was perhaps the most popular Secretary of Health to ever have occupied the position.

He hails from Tondo, the same locality of revolutionary leader Andres Bonifacio. It may be argued further, that like the late Supremo, Flavier led a health revolution in his own way, both as a health secretary and as a senator.

Education and first service

After graduating from Baguio City High School, he continued his studies in the University of the Philippines, later graduating in 1960 with a degree of Medicine from the University’s campus in Manila.

Instead of engaging in a lucrative medical practice as was the common choice for individuals who wished to cash in on the hard work they have spent studying, Juan Flavier joined the Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement (PRRM), a non-governmental organization (NGO) which focused on ameliorating the lives of the rural dwellers with livelihood programs, health programs and free education.

With a goal to better serve his barrio people, he earned his Masters in Public health from the prestigious Johns Hopkins University, which gave him new insights that he employed as the President of PRRM and the International Institute of Rural reconstruction, the international umbrella of the aforementioned organization.
                His anecdotes with the barrio people are well-detailed in his books, “Doctor to the Barrios,” “My Friends in the Barrios,” and “Back to the Barrios: Balikbaryo.” Together, these books speak a volume of his selfless dedication to public service in the form of tangible health policies and practices. And for which would catch the attention of Then-President Fidel Ramos, who asked him to be his cabinet’s Secretary of Health. This is where he did wonders.

As Secretary of Health                

He led the ailing Philippine public health care system, and reinvigorated it.

Commanding experience and expertise with public health care as a barrio doctor, he developed nation-wide policies such as Oplan Alis Disease, which led to the World Health Organization declaring the country as polio-free. Under the slogan “Let’s DOH it,” he called for active participation of NGOs and the public alike with engaging infomercials. He instigated Sangkap Pinoy, which incentivized food companies to inject some of their products, yes even junk food, a set amount of vitamins.

He lead AIDS information campaigns, even gave away condoms and other contraceptives, leading to then-Cardinal Jaime Sin to refer to him as an “agent of Satan.” (Human Rights Watch, 2011) He successfully transformed the Department of Health into a dynamic office, making it the number one department in the Ramos administration. (Department of Health)

Because of his outstanding performance in the Cabinet, he was asked to join the administration’s ticket in the 1995 elections. Among the 12 winning candidates, he placed 5th. Among the 12, he spent the least amount of money, relying only on his name recall, track record and reputation as a public servant.

As Senator of Health

There of course, is no official designation such as “Senator of Health.” But his focus as a Senator is no different from being a doctor.  To best characterize his three consecutive terms would be as a doctor of the nation’s ailing health system. As a newbie senator, he never incurred an absence.

Some of the landmark legislations he authored and sponsored are the Traditional Medicine Law, which focused on the integration of indigenous-discovered medicine in the realm of mainstream medicine. The Philippine Nursing Act, The Dangerous Drugs Act, the precursor of the current Sin Tax Law, the Tobacco Regulation Act. After the corruption and violence perpetrated by University of Santo Tomas Reserved Corps against one of their own was exposed to the world, he introduced the National Service Training Program, showcasing the other ways a Filipino youth could serve the nation without taking up arms.

Holistically looking at society and realizing that the socioeconomic status of society affect people’s health, he went beyond health laws and introduced these legislations: The Poverty Alleviation Law, which formed the National Anti-Poverty Commission. The Indigenous People’s Rights Act, the Anti-money Laundering Act.

Although admittedly spending less than other Senatorial candidates of the 2001 elections, he won reelection and most surprisingly, placed 2nd among his peers. Again, he won his last allowable term in 2004, finishing it in 2007. If people voted people like him to Senate, there is hope to the country. And if people like him were voted then, there’s still hope. 

Reference:
Department of Health N/A. Biography of Dr. Juan flavier. Department of Health website. http://www.doh.gov.ph/node/1281.html. March 4, 2014
Senate of the Philippines, N/A. Still “DOH”-ing It!. Biography of Senators. Senate of the Philippines website. http://www.senate.gov.ph/senators/sen_bio/flavier_bio.asp
Flavier, Juan Martin, 1970. Doctor to the Barrios. New Day Publisher. Quezon City, Philippines.
Flavier, Juan Martin, 1998. Let’s DOH it!: How we did it. J.M. Flavier. Quezon City, Philippines.
Flavier, Juan Martin, 1978. Back to the Barrios. New Day Publisher. Quezon City, Philippines.
Human Rights Watch, 2004. Sex, Condoms, and the Human Right to Health. Human Rights Watch. New York City, United States.

SPOKEN READING:


Individual Project by Jonelle Retorca, 2013-37752

              Ramon Barba: A Great Scientist, A Filipino Hero
In the 31st of August 1939, a genius from San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte Philippines was born. He is the youngest of the four children of John Madamba Barba and Lourdes Cabanos.His name is the famous Dr. Jesus Ramon Cabanos Barba, a Filipino chemist that has PH.D. in Horticulture that the Philippines must be proud of. With a lawyer father and a mother who as well graduated in University of the Philippines, it cannot be denied that he got his talents and intellect from his parents. At his early stage of life, he took up his grade school in Sta. Rosa Academy and ranked as third highest over his fellow graduates when he graduated way back 1951. He continued his high school studies at University of the Philippines High School, obtained a BS in Agriculture degree Major in Agronomy or Fruit Production at UP Los BaƱos in 1958. He attained his Master’s degree in 1962 and Doctorate in 1967 at University of Georgia in USA and University of Hawaii respectively.
  He joined UP Los BaƱos in 1968. He received several research awards including TOYM (1974), UPAA Lifetime Distinguished Award (2004), IBM/DOST Science and Technology Award (1989), Gamma Sigma Delta Distinguished Award 919970, NRCP (1986), PHILAAS (2004). He owned patents in the Philippines 919730, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom (recognized in all Commonwealth Countries), and United States of America. But he did not enforce these patents, now expired. (source: Science and Technology Post, Technology Generator, 2008)
            He received many awards and recognitions along his journey in life. Among those recognitions and achievements in life; what really made an impact to the world, to the society, and to the people is his contribution on mango farming and tropical tree physiology. He created the ‘flower induction technology on mangos’. A technology that enhances the production of mango fruits making the fruits available though it is not yet the season for mangos to bear fruits. Mango is one of the fruits that most people love to eat because of its palatable taste and high nutritive value. And making it available in the market for the whole year would be a great thing to deal on. With Mr. Barba’s research on the flower induction technology of mango together with other scientists, availability of mangos is now for real.
Dr. Barba’s flower induction technology hauled mango from virtual neglect until 1974 to become Republic of the Philippines’ 2nd major fruit export valued at $60M and leader in Gross Value Added to Agriculture at P16B in 2007. (source: Science and Technology Post, Technology Generator, 2008)
            The emergence of the discovery of mango’s flower induction technology helped and contributed greatly on Philippines’ economy. Aside from providing mangos to the world, it also added to the gross income of the country through the increase in the export of mangos. This technology is not only recognized and applied in the Philippines but also by some countries of the world. Moreover it is said that:
The Philippines is now the world’s second biggest mango exporter (7.8% share) behind Mexico (41%) whose variety “Manila and its KNO3 flowering technology are both of Philippine origin. Flower induction is applied more aggressively in Mexico and Brazil. (source: Science and Technology Post, Technology Generator, 2008)
            Dr. Ramon Barba, is a great man to be considered, a pride for Filipinos. He proves that Filipinos can be capable of becoming recognized throughout the world, that we got the talent and hence we can be globally competitive. He also ended the urge and demand of people for mangos any time of the year by making the seasonal fruit available anytime of the year.
            By helping the Philippine mangos export increase, Barba contributed a lot in supporting Philippine economy. A good economy makes a country stable and vigorous in facing problems of a country such as poverty and allows the government to perform well its duty to the people. Though there are still more that Philippines has do to obtain a much stable economy like other rich countries, still this little contribution of increase in the mango exports of the country is of much help and is well appreciated. With that I consider and recognize Dr. Barba as one of the great hero of the Philippines considering his great contribution on mango production.
            With his achievements in life and the achievements that he will soon succeed on as Dr. Barba continues his journey in life in researching, inventing, and innovating things related to agriculture and chemistry, his name will be greatly recognized not just in his own country, not by the people of his generation but throughout the world and by the future generations. I know he can do more, I believe in him because he made me so with his flower induction technology. His name will be marked in the history like other famous scientists throughout the world.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bellis, Mary. 2014. “Ramon Barba- Filipino Scientist.” About.com Inventor. http://inventors.about.com/od/filipinoscientists/p/RamonBarba.htm. February 23, 2014.
“Filipino Scientist: Dr. Ramon C. Barba.” (2010). Filipino and Foreign Chemist. http://www.filipinoandforeignchemist.com/testament.php?chemist=7. February 17, 2014.
“Ramon Barba.” (2012). Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia. http://tl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramon_Barba. February 20, 2014.
“Technology Generator: Dr. Ramon Barba.” (2008). Science and Technology Post. http://sntpost.stii.dost.gov.ph/NewPOST/AprJun2008/technologygenerators/Dr_Ramon_Barba.htm. February 25, 2014.
Vergara, Benito S. 2011. A milestone in Mango History. Mango World Magazine. http://mangoworldmagazine.blogspot.com/2011/11/dr-ramon-barba-recognized-for-lifetime.html. March 9, 2014.

Arturo Alcaraz: Father of Geothermal Energy

The Philippines has several possibilities to get clean and cheap energy. The tropical climate and the geological circumstances are responsible for three different energy resources: solar energy, natural gas and geothermal energy. In the Philippines, geothermal energy already provides 27% of the country's total electricity production generated in power plants. Worldwide, the Philippines rank second to the United States in producing geothermic energy. What made us reach this position we are in now? What started the geothermal energy development in our country? I think the better question would be, who. Let's find out.


Dr. Paulo Campos: "The Father of Nuclear Medicine" in the Philippines

All around the world, we have seen many scientists contribute to their country and have made science, medicine and inventions useful to our daily human lives. In our country, that is agricultural in nature, we have also evolved from organic to Nuclear Medicine.
Among the most prestigious and award winning researches include The Genetic Factor in Endemic Goiter, the Cr-51 Tagged Red Cell Studies and the Observation on some Parameter of Insulin Actions. All of these came from one man alone. He graduated in the same university we are in, The University of the Philippines. He finished his doctor of medicine degree here then he attended postgraduate studies at the John Hopkins School of Medicine and Harvard School Medicine in the years 1953 to 1958. Then at the Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Medicine in 1958. He is the “Father of Nuclear Medicine” here in the Philippines. He is Paulo Campos. (Sabater, 2006).
Born on the date of July 27, 1921 in DasmariƱas Cavite, was also known for establishing the first Radioisotope Laboratory in the Philippines, Also the first Research Laboratory in the UP’s (University of the Philippines) Department of Medicine, and the Thyroid Clinic of the UP Philippines General Hospital Medical Center. He then established the UP Comprehensive Community Health Program and Facilities located in Bay, Laguna. (Sabater, 2006).
               Dr. Campos was the president for 10 years in the National Academy of Science and Technology (NAST) and was conferred a National Scientist in 1989 by the late president of the Republic of the Philippines, President Corazon Aquino. Not only did he contribute much to his alma mater, but also to his hometown where he was the founder of the Medical Center Manila and the De La Salle University-DasmariƱas in Cavite and the Emilio Aguinaldo College in Manila.
               He passes away at the age of 85 on the 2nd of June in 2006, due to heart complications and diabetes mellitus, this resulted to multi-organ failure. (Sabater, 2006).


“Dr. Paulo Campos, a visionary and an eminent physician, was interested in the study of thyroid diseases and their treatment using nuclear medicine. Through his efforts, the first radioisotope lab with a scintillation scanner, a gamma well counter, a scaler, and several monitors were established and made available at the John F. Cotton Hospital. As a result, they were able to do thyroid studies, treat hyperthyroidism, polycythemia vera and leukemia with P-32.” (Barrenechea, 2013)

Reference List:
Sabater, Madel. 2006 .National Scientist Dr. Paulo Campos passes away at 85. The Manila Bulletin Online. http://web.archive.org/web/20070914101126/http://www.mb.com.ph/issues/2007/ 06/05/MAIN2007060595261.html. March 6, 2014.

Barrenechea, Emerita. 2013. History of Nuclear Medicine in the Philippines. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine. http://www.wjnm.org/article.asp?issn=14501147;year=2013;volume=12;issue=4;spa ge=182;epage=182;aulast=Barrenechea. March 5, 2014. 

March 8, 2014

Melancholia: Science, Society, and Depression

A BRIEF HISTORY OF DEPRESSION
Depression goes way back to the times of the ancient Egyptians and Greeks. Back then, depression was thought to be caused by the gods, at least until Hippocrates came along. Hippocrates thought depression was due to an imbalance in substances in the body. In the 1900s, Emil Kraeplin hypothesized mental illness was related to the chemistry of the brain (much like Hippocrates) and Sigmund Freud hypothesized it was due to childhood events and other relationships; both ideas are correct.
In the 17th century, a woman named Dorthea Dix took up the task of convincing states in America to build asylums. Though some people were treated and discharged, the majority were readmitted or never left. The asylums eventually fell into neglect, and as such, the jobs for its upkeep and administration went to unskilled persons. Though people still supported the idea that the mentally ill be put away in hospitals, no one really lobbied for better facilities or admin. Back then, most of the mentally ill were shipped off to these institutions because living at home became difficult. However during the rise of medication for these illnesses, living at home became easier for the mentally ill. Today, a combination of talk therapy (psychotherapy) and medication is usually used to treat mental illness.


AN OVERVIEW
There are actually many kinds of depression but the scope of this paper will only cover major unipolar depression (as opposed to bipolar depression, in which there are also episodes of mania colloquially known as “highs”). Though symptoms vary from person to person, the following seem to be very common: difficulty in concentrating and decision making, overeating or loss of appetite, hypersomnia or insomnia, loss of interest in activities that were once interesting, and persistent anxiety and sadness.
Depression is a persistent illness, but it is hard to say whether the number of people afflicted by depression is growing, or whether people are slowly becoming more and more aware of the condition and how to treat it. Currently depression is still misunderstood in some circles because most people experience at least a mild depression once in their lives. The problem is that some people equate that mild depression to the more major forms, which are not as easily treated or overcome. Depression is not just pessimism or choosing to be unhappy. It is the inability to make that choice.


THE ILLNESS ITSELF
It has been observed in some depressives that they tend to go into a cycle of depression (recovery and relapse) which is governed the body’s biological clock. In the brains of depressives, there is decreased activity in the prefrontal cortex (responsible for decision making and strategizing) and the subgenual region. There is increased activity in the amygdala (involved in memory and emotional response) and the thalamus (controls motor function and sleeping). Other changes associated with depression include the imabalance in brain chemistry (notably the concentrations of serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine. Dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine were related to anhedonia, persistent grief, and psychomotor retardation respectively. It was also observed that drugs  inhibiting Substance P (a neurotransmitter associated with physical pain) could relieve symptoms of depression; the brain uses the same neurotransmitter for physical and mental pain.
Major depression can be characterized by (but is not limited to) anhedonia, self-injury (including suicide attempts), psychomotor retardation. The last characteristic is probably what makes depression so crippling—simple tasks suddenly become complex and difficult to accomplish. Again, since people assume depression is equal to a little sadness, they might not understand how debilitating it can be. As a mental illness, it can also be discriminated upon by just being “all in your head” when in reality is has very strong biological basis.
“Some catastrophic moments invite clarity, explode in split moments: You smash your hand through a windowpane and then there is blood and shattered glass stained with red all over the place; you fall out a window and break some bones and scrape some skin. Stitches and casts and bandages and antiseptic solve and salve the wounds. But depression is not a sudden disaster. It is more like a cancer: At first its tumorous mass is not even noticeable to the careful eye, and then one day—wham!—there is a huge, deadly seven-pound lump lodged in your brain or your stomach or your shoulder blade, and this thing that your own body has produced is actually trying to kill you. Depression is a lot like that: Slowly, over the years, the data will accumulate in your heart and mind, a computer program for total negativity will build into your system, making life feel more and more unbearable. But you won't even notice it coming on, thinking that it is somehow normal, something about getting older, about turning eight or turning twelve or turning fifteen, and then one day you realize that your entire life is just awful, not worth living, a horror and a black blot on the white terrain of human existence. One morning you wake up afraid you are going to live. […]
That's the thing I want to make clear about depression: It's got nothing at all to do with life. In the course of life, there is sadness and pain and sorrow, all of which, in their right time and season, are normal—unpleasant, but normal. Depression is an altogether different zone because it involves a complete absence: absence of affect, absence of feeling, absence of response, absence of interest. The pain you feel in the course of a major clinical depression is an attempt on nature's part (nature, after all, abhors a vacuum) to fill up the empty space. But for all intents and purposes, the deeply depressed are just the walking, waking dead.”
—Prozac Nation
REFERENCES
1. Muckenhoupt, Margaret, 2003. Dorothea Dix: Advocate for Mental Health Care. United States of America: Oxford University Press.
2. Roy, Jennifer, 2005. Depression. New York: Marshall Cavendish.
3. Sapolsky, Robert. Stanford’s Sapolsky On Depression in U.S. (Full Lecture). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOAgplgTxfc. February 10, 2014.
4. Wolpert, Lewis, 1999. Malignant Sadness: The Anatomy of Depression. New York: The Free Press.

5. Wurtzel, Elizabeth, 1999. Prozac Nation: Young and Depressed in America. United States of America: Replica Books.

Cadiz, M.T.M.
STS THY

A Samsung Galaxy S4 Story


In 2013, Samsung released the latest installment in their Galaxy Series, the Samsung Galaxy S4. The S4 boasts a lot of technologically advanced features and also its sleek appearance. Here is a fiction piece revolving around one of the world's best smart phones.
















Reference list:
for plot:
2013. Samsung Galaxy S4 Specifications.Samsung Galaxy S4. http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxys4/. March 7, 2014.
2013. Samsung Galaxy S4 Features. Samsung Galaxy S4. http://www.samsung.com/levant/consumer/mobile-phones/mobile-phones/smart-phones/GT-I9500ZKAMID-features. March 7, 2014

for pictures:
still cuts taken from the drama "The Heirs" and "Dream High"
http://www.t-araworld.net/2012/04/tara-eunjungs-dream-high-to-be-aired-in.html&sa=U&ei=QsQbU_-dL8LkiAeKw4DgBA&ved=0CDEQ9QEwAg&sig2=RhE54NpAP_9DsuSck-CO3w&usg=AFQjCNGa-hPmicbdz3Qjns_VjoHsLgleBw. March 8, 2014
http://www.pinterest.com/pin/504755070707783191/. March 8, 2014.
http://www.samsung.com/levant/consumer/mobile-phones/mobile-phones/smart-phones/GT-I9500ZKAMID-features.March 8, 2014
http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kpopfix.com%2Ftag%2Fkdrama-mother%2F&docid=YsYG9d4NuboChM&imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kpopfix.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F04%2FKHJ-BOF1.jpg&w=600&h=330&ei=rMQbU-bQLsXNiAeo34C4CQ&zoom=1&ved=0CFcQhBwwAQ&iact=rc&dur=1610&page=1&start=0&ndsp=16. March 8, 2014
http%3A%2F%2Fedschultzmsnbc.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F04%2F08%2F80-border-patrol-agents-arrested-over-5-years-period-along-the-quess-which-border-and-u-s-officials-claim-to-be-surprised-let-me-show-you-my-shocked-face%2F. March 8, 2014
http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photography-attractive-woman-kissing-her-mobile-phone-image9840902. March 8, 2014
http://joonni.com/2013/09/10/countdown-to-the-heirs-d-29/. March 9, 2014
http://www.kpopstarz.com/tags/the-heirs. March 9, 2014
http://tomonz.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-119.html. March 9, 2014.
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/132774-android-4-1-jelly-bean-on-the-verizon-galaxy-nexus-video-and-how-to-guide. March 9, 2014.