December 11, 2013

Reaction Paper: The Fly (1958)


Dull lighting, corny music, draggy pacing, stiff or superfluous acting – these are just some of the reasons I never really shared a love for old films. And as much as retro cinematography didn’t appeal to me, “The Fly” did very little to change my notion on old films.

It was boring, weird and disturbing. The show basically had all the elements of an old film I was dreading to see: dull, retro production, turtle-paced plot development, awkward and sometimes, off musical scoring and occasional superfluous acting. The one thing I love about old films though, beyond their classical aspects, is the wealth of invaluable insights and relevant lessons to be learned on various social, political and scientific aspects that are rarely derived with commercial cinema nowadays.

The film projects Scientists as innovators who strive to make society grow and be more efficient through their discoveries and inventions. Andre, the protagonist of the film, falls short in following the conduct of Science by testing the teleportation machine on himself without perfectly ensuring its stability and taking necessary precautions.

In effect, various levels of morality play manifest in the film on the aspects of Science, Andre’s family and and Andre himself as the Scientist. Andre, realizing that he could well be unleashing a contraption into a world that may not be ready to accept such an innovation, readily destroys all traces of his research and equipment, hoping that the abomination he has become will be the last Earth has to see. This also took a negative toll on Andre’s family, forcing his wife to kill the monster her husband has become and causing their son to be fatherless.

Science, as depicted by the movie and its era, is indeed a powerful thing to harness with lots of potential to create, as well as destroy.

No comments:

Post a Comment